Wagner v. United States
This text of 606 F. App'x 121 (Wagner v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Wagner appeals the district court’s orders dismissing, after a bench trial, his negligence action brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 (West 2006 & Supp.2014), and denying his motion for a new trial. We have considered the parties’ arguments and have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wagner v. United States, No. 3:12-cv-00130-GCM, 2014 WL 1333666 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 2, 2014; Aug. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
606 F. App'x 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-united-states-ca4-2015.