Wagner v. True Manufacturing, Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wagner v. True Manufacturing, Co.

498 S.W.3d 859, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 899, 2016 WL 4751791

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 13, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103981

StatusPublished

This text of 498 S.W.3d 859 (Wagner v. True Manufacturing, Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagner v. True Manufacturing, Co., 498 S.W.3d 859, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 899, 2016 WL 4751791 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

True Manufacturing ■ Company, Inc, (“Employer”) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) decision finding Jermain Wagner (“Employee”)' was not disqualified from unemployment benefits due to misconduct. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on. appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided' a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

True Manufacturing ■ Company, Inc, (“Employer”) appeals from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission’s (“Commission”) decision finding Jermain Wagner (“Employee”)' was not disqualified from unemployment benefits due to misconduct. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on. appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided' a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

498 S.W.3d 859, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 899, 2016 WL 4751791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-true-manufacturing-co-moctapp-2016.