Wagner v. Talent Irrigation District

Oregon Supreme Court

Wagner v. Talent Irrigation District

466 P.2d 619, 258 Or. 523

DecidedFebruary 27, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 466 P.2d 619 (Wagner v. Talent Irrigation District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagner v. Talent Irrigation District, 466 P.2d 619, 258 Or. 523 (Or. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

O’CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of seepage from defendant’s irrigation canal. Defendant appeals from an order of the Circuit Court for Jackson County granting a new trial.

The two assignments of error presented on this appeal present the same issues as those raised in the companion case of Furrer v. Talent Irrigation District, decided this day. Adopting the reasoning in the Furrer case, we hold that the trial court did not err in granting a new trial.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

O’CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained as a result of seepage from defendant’s irrigation canal. Defendant appeals from an order of the Circuit Court for Jackson County granting a new trial.

The two assignments of error presented on this appeal present the same issues as those raised in the companion case of Furrer v. Talent Irrigation District, decided this day. Adopting the reasoning in the Furrer case, we hold that the trial court did not err in granting a new trial.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

466 P.2d 619, 258 Or. 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-talent-irrigation-district-or-1970.