Wagner v. Office of the Public Defender

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 2013·No. SCPW-13-0001162·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-13-0001162

26-JUN-2013

12:59 PM

SCPW-13-0001162

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

JOHN WAGNER, Petitioner,

vs.

OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and BETSY STUELKE, Respondents.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CR. NO. 04-1-305K)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner John Wagner’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed May 30, 2013, and the record, it appears that petitioner has alternative means to seek relief and, therefore, is not entitled to a writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 26, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wagner v. Office of the Public Defender, (haw 2013).

Wagner v. Office of the Public Defender (Wagner v. Office of the Public Defender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kema v. Gaddis
982 P.2d 334 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1999)