Wagner v. Office of the Public Defender
Opinion
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCPW-13-0001162
26-JUN-2013
12:59 PM
SCPW-13-0001162
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
JOHN WAGNER, Petitioner,
vs.
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and BETSY STUELKE, Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
(CR. NO. 04-1-305K)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)
Upon consideration of petitioner John Wagner’s petition for a writ of mandamus, filed May 30, 2013, and the record, it appears that petitioner has alternative means to seek relief and, therefore, is not entitled to a writ of mandamus. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the clerk of the appellate court shall process the petition for a writ of mandamus without payment of the filing fee.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 26, 2013.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wagner v. Office of the Public Defender (Wagner v. Office of the Public Defender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.