Wagner v. Mishel

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Wagner v. Mishel

148 N.Y.S. 1148

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 18, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 148 N.Y.S. 1148 (Wagner v. Mishel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagner v. Mishel, 148 N.Y.S. 1148 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The testimony in this case shows that the workmanship -upon the catalogues for the printing of which the plaintiff brought this action is of a most inferior quality, rendering them entirely unfit for the purposes for which the plaintiff knew that they were intended, and the testimony to that effect is fully confirmed by an examination of fhe specimens [1149]*1149offered in evidence and submitted upon the hearing of this appeal. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Costs in this action to be offset ngainst the audgment in No. 112.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The testimony in this case shows that the workmanship -upon the catalogues for the printing of which the plaintiff brought this action is of a most inferior quality, rendering them entirely unfit for the purposes for which the plaintiff knew that they were intended, and the testimony to that effect is fully confirmed by an examination of fhe specimens [1149]*1149offered in evidence and submitted upon the hearing of this appeal. Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs. Costs in this action to be offset ngainst the audgment in No. 112.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 N.Y.S. 1148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-mishel-nyappterm-1914.