Wagner v. McGraw

Fourth Circuit

Wagner v. McGraw

459 F. App'x 290

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 22, 2011·No. No. 11-1792·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Van Wagner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Emergency Petition for Writ of Prohibition.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Van Wagner v. McGraw, No. 3:11-cv-00058-JPB-DJJ (N.D.W.Va. July 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

George Van Wagner appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his “Emergency Petition for Writ of Prohibition.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Van Wagner v. McGraw, No. 3:11-cv-00058-JPB-DJJ (N.D.W.Va. July 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Wagner v. McGraw, 459 F. App'x 290 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

459 F. App'x 290 (Wagner v. McGraw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.