Wagner v. Inhabitants of Camden

73 Me. 485, 1882 Me. LEXIS 74
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedMay 29, 1882
StatusPublished

This text of 73 Me. 485 (Wagner v. Inhabitants of Camden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wagner v. Inhabitants of Camden, 73 Me. 485, 1882 Me. LEXIS 74 (Me. 1882).

Opinion

Walton, J.

The notice to the municipal officers of a town, required by the act of 1877, c. 206, must state not only the nature and location of the defect, and the nature of the injuries received, but it must also set forth the injured person’s claim for damages, or it will not be sufficient. The notice in this case contains no claim for damages, nor any intimation that such a claim is made. It states that the plaintiff received personal injuries on account of a defect, and it describes the defect, but it contains no statement that the plaintiff claimed to recover damages of the town on'account of his injuries. Such a notice is clearly defective and insufficient under the statute above cited. As stipulated in the report, the entry must be,

Plaintiff nonsuit.

Daneorth, Virgin, Peters, Libbey and Symonds, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Me. 485, 1882 Me. LEXIS 74, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-inhabitants-of-camden-me-1882.