Wagner v. Gonzales

D.C. Circuit

Wagner v. Gonzales

180 F. App'x 181

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 3, 2006·No. No. 05-5463·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed October 3, 2005, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of the dismissal of the action for failure to allege any injury personal to appellant. See Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C.Cir.1996).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by the appellant. It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed October 3, 2005, be affirmed. The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying reconsideration of the dismissal of the action for failure to allege any injury personal to appellant. See Firestone v. Firestone, 76 F.3d 1205, 1208 (D.C.Cir.1996).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R. App. P. 41(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Wagner v. Gonzales, 180 F. App'x 181 (D.C. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

180 F. App'x 181 (Wagner v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related