Wagner v. Einhorn

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Wagner v. Einhorn

88 N.Y.S. 370

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 19, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 88 N.Y.S. 370 (Wagner v. Einhorn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagner v. Einhorn, 88 N.Y.S. 370 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

SCOTT, J.

If the cause had been submitted to the jury and a verplaintiff, court setting it aside as against the evidence. There was, however, some contradictory evidence in the case, and the direction of a verdict was consequently improper. McDonald v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 167 N. Y. 66, 60 N. E. 282.

Judgment and order reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SCOTT, J.

If the cause had been submitted to the jury and a verplaintiff, court setting it aside as against the evidence. There was, however, some contradictory evidence in the case, and the direction of a verdict was consequently improper. McDonald v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 167 N. Y. 66, 60 N. E. 282.

Judgment and order reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

88 N.Y.S. 370, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-einhorn-nyappterm-1904.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack