Wagner v. D'Alauro

49 A.D.2d 901, 373 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11131

This text of 49 A.D.2d 901 (Wagner v. D'Alauro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wagner v. D'Alauro, 49 A.D.2d 901, 373 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11131 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

In four negligence actions which were tried jointly, Mildred A. Young and James H. Young (sometimes called James H. Young, Jr.) appeal from an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered January 24, 1975. Interlocutory judgment affirmed, with one bill of costs jointly to respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs. The jury verdict is supported by the credible evidence. In fact, any other finding would have been against the weight of the credible evidence. The jury charge was not insufficient, misleading or legally incorrect. Martuscello, Acting P. J., Latham, Cohalan, Margett and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 A.D.2d 901, 373 N.Y.S.2d 409, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11131, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-dalauro-nyappdiv-1975.