Wagner v. Adams

New York Supreme Court

Wagner v. Adams

1 How. Pr. 191

DecidedJune 15, 1845

StatusPublished

This text of 1 How. Pr. 191 (Wagner v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagner v. Adams, 1 How. Pr. 191 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

Pincite

Opinion

H. Adams for defendant, persisted that the statute on this subject should be construed as requiring the plaintiff himself to execute the bond [192]*192with one or more sureties. J. Newland for plaintiff, cited 2 R. S., 575, § 4; 4 Paige, 273, showing that the plaintiff need not join in the bond*

Jewett, Justice.

It is not necessary that the plaintiff should himself execute the bond, when he does not, two sufficient sureties must do so.

The motion was disposed of on other points.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

H. Adams for defendant, persisted that the statute on this subject should be construed as requiring the plaintiff himself to execute the bond [192]*192with one or more sureties. J. Newland for plaintiff, cited 2 R. S., 575, § 4; 4 Paige, 273, showing that the plaintiff need not join in the bond*

Jewett, Justice.

It is not necessary that the plaintiff should himself execute the bond, when he does not, two sufficient sureties must do so.

The motion was disposed of on other points.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 How. Pr. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagner-v-adams-nysupct-1845.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack