Wagner Tug Boat Co. v. Meagher

Supreme Court

Wagner Tug Boat Co. v. Meagher

287 U.S. 657, 53 S. Ct. 120

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 14, 1932·No. No. 433·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

The petition for writ of certiorari in this cause is denied upon the ground that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is joint and the record fails to disclose summons and [658]*658severance. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bunn, 285 U. S. 169; Capital National Bank v. Board of Supervisors, 286 U. S. 550; Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Hanson, ante, p. 599; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Parker, ante, p. 569.

Messrs. Walter L. Clark, Roszél C. Thomsen, and Stephen V. Carey for petitioner. Mr. Winter S. Martin for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for writ of certiorari in this cause is denied upon the ground that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is joint and the record fails to disclose summons and [658]*658severance. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bunn, 285 U. S. 169; Capital National Bank v. Board of Supervisors, 286 U. S. 550; Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Hanson, ante, p. 599; Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Parker, ante, p. 569.

Messrs. Walter L. Clark, Roszél C. Thomsen, and Stephen V. Carey for petitioner. Mr. Winter S. Martin for respondent.

Wagner Tug Boat Co. v. Meagher, 287 U.S. 657, 53 S. Ct. 120 (1932).

Pincite

287 U.S. 657 (Wagner Tug Boat Co. v. Meagher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related