Wagnell Realty, Inc. v. Great Northern Syndicate, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wagnell Realty, Inc. v. Great Northern Syndicate, Inc.

44 A.D.2d 816, 359 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4929

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 816 (Wagnell Realty, Inc. v. Great Northern Syndicate, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wagnell Realty, Inc. v. Great Northern Syndicate, Inc., 44 A.D.2d 816, 359 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 26, 1974, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of Korn, J., at Special Term. Concur—Kupferman, Murphy, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ,; Nunez, J. P., dissents in the following memorandum: I would reverse and deny summary judgment. In this declaratory judgment action involving the rights of a landlord and a tenant in possession of commercial property, the court, apparently sua sponte summarily directed appellant tenant to remove from respondent’s property. It is conceded that no notice to vacate or to terminate the sublease had been given to appellant. No opportunity was given to defend [817]*817its right to continue in possession under a lease not expiring until 1979. It is claimed that the tenant recently expended large sums ($200,000) to improve its space. Appellant, in my opinion, has been denied due process by the court’s summary disposition of this important litigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 26, 1974, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of Korn, J., at Special Term. Concur—Kupferman, Murphy, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ,; Nunez, J. P., dissents in the following memorandum: I would reverse and deny summary judgment. In this declaratory judgment action involving the rights of a landlord and a tenant in possession of commercial property, the court, apparently sua sponte summarily directed appellant tenant to remove from respondent’s property. It is conceded that no notice to vacate or to terminate the sublease had been given to appellant. No opportunity was given to defend [817]*817its right to continue in possession under a lease not expiring until 1979. It is claimed that the tenant recently expended large sums ($200,000) to improve its space. Appellant, in my opinion, has been denied due process by the court’s summary disposition of this important litigation.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 816, 359 N.Y.S.2d 521, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagnell-realty-inc-v-great-northern-syndicate-inc-nyappdiv-1974.