Wagman v. Wagman

8 A.D.3d 263, 777 N.Y.S.2d 678
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 1, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by258 cases

This text of 8 A.D.3d 263 (Wagman v. Wagman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wagman v. Wagman, 8 A.D.3d 263, 777 N.Y.S.2d 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 16, 1996, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Shapiro, J.), dated January 7, 2003, which granted the plaintiffs motion for an award of an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is denied.

A party may recover an attorney’s fee from an adversary spouse where there is substantial compliance with 22 NYCRR 1400.3 (see Mulcahy v Mulcahy, 285 AD2d 587 [2001]; Flanagan v Flanagan, 267 AD2d 80 [1999]). In this case, the award of counsel fees was improper. The retainer agreement was not filed with the court until the making of this motion and, therefore, the plaintiffs counsel did not substantially comply with 22 NYCRR 1400.3. In any event, although 22 NYCRR 1400.1 required the plaintiffs counsel to render a written bill at least every 60 days, there is no evidence that any bill was rendered and none was submitted in support of the motion for an amount of an attorney’s fee. This failure alone warrants the denial of the motion (see Julien v Machson, 245 AD2d 122 [1997]; Kaplowitz v Newman, 185 Misc 2d 205 [2000]).

The parties’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Townes, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Reisz v. Reisz
2025 NY Slip Op 03089 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Safir v. Safir
2025 NY Slip Op 02095 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Spataro v. Spataro
180 N.Y.S.3d 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Swergold v. Weinrib
2021 NY Slip Op 02555 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Greco v. Greco
2018 NY Slip Op 3509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Nicholas A. Gabriele, P.C. v. Feldman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
Montoya v. Montoya
2016 NY Slip Op 6807 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Badawi v. Alesawy
135 A.D.3d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)
Matter of Silver v. Green
119 A.D.3d 806 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Rosado v. Rosado
100 A.D.3d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Hovanec v. Hovanec
79 A.D.3d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Bentz v. Bentz
71 A.D.3d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Edelstein v. Greisman
67 A.D.3d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Gahagan v. Gahagan
51 A.D.3d 863 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Zelenz v. Zelenz
43 A.D.3d 1157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Sherman v. Sherman
34 A.D.3d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Grald v. Grald
33 A.D.3d 922 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Pillai v. Pillai
15 A.D.3d 466 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 A.D.3d 263, 777 N.Y.S.2d 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagman-v-wagman-nyappdiv-2004.