Wagman v. Kalik

24 N.Y.3d 1199
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 12, 2015
StatusPublished

This text of 24 N.Y.3d 1199 (Wagman v. Kalik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wagman v. Kalik, 24 N.Y.3d 1199 (N.Y. 2015).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from so much of the Appellate Division order as affirmed so much of the March 2012 Surrogate’s Court order dismissing the action transferred from Supreme Court, denied; motion for leave to appeal otherwise dismissed upon the ground that the remainder of the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding on the Surrogate’s Court accountings within the meaning of the Constitution (see Burke v Crosson, 85 NY2d 10, 15-16 [1995]).

Judges Stein and Fahey taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burke v. Crosson
647 N.E.2d 736 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 N.Y.3d 1199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wagman-v-kalik-ny-2015.