Waggoner
149 Ct. Cl. 838, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1960 WL 1469
Opinion
Military pay; retired pay. Upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and defendant’s motion for summary judgment, together with oral argument by counsel and based upon Prentiss v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 225, and Bond v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 204, it was ordered that plaintiff’s motion be granted, and defendant’s motion denied with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Eule 38(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waggoner, 149 Ct. Cl. 838, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1960 WL 1469 (cc 1960).
149 Ct. Cl. 838 (Waggoner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Prentiss v. United States
105 F. Supp. 989 (Court of Claims, 1952)
Bond v. United States
135 F. Supp. 433 (Court of Claims, 1955)