Waggoner

Court of Claims

Waggoner

149 Ct. Cl. 838, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1960 WL 1469

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedApril 22, 1960

DocketNo. 483-58

StatusPublished

This text of 149 Ct. Cl. 838 (Waggoner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Waggoner, 149 Ct. Cl. 838, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1960 WL 1469 (cc 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Military pay; retired pay. Upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and defendant’s motion for summary judgment, together with oral argument by counsel and based upon Prentiss v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 225, and Bond v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 204, it was ordered that plaintiff’s motion be granted, and defendant’s motion denied with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Eule 38(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Military pay; retired pay. Upon consideration of plaintiff’s motion for judgment on the pleadings and defendant’s motion for summary judgment, together with oral argument by counsel and based upon Prentiss v. United States, 123 C. Cls. 225, and Bond v. United States, 133 C. Cls. 204, it was ordered that plaintiff’s motion be granted, and defendant’s motion denied with the amount of recovery to be determined pursuant to Eule 38(c).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 Ct. Cl. 838, 1960 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 101, 1960 WL 1469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waggoner-cc-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack