Wages v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Wages v. State

145 S.E. 768, 38 Ga. App. 751, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 432

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 14, 1928

Docket19221

StatusPublished

This text of 145 S.E. 768 (Wages v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wages v. State, 145 S.E. 768, 38 Ga. App. 751, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 432 (Ga. Ct. App. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence of possessing intoxicating liquor. The evidence did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, 0. J., and Buhe, J., concur. Wolver M. Smith, James W. Arnold, for plaintiff in error. Pemberton Cooley, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence of possessing intoxicating liquor. The evidence did not exclude every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused, and the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, 0. J., and Buhe, J., concur. Wolver M. Smith, James W. Arnold, for plaintiff in error. Pemberton Cooley, solicitor-general, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 S.E. 768, 38 Ga. App. 751, 1928 Ga. App. LEXIS 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wages-v-state-gactapp-1928.