Wager v. General Motors Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Wager v. General Motors Corp.

236 A.D.2d 604, 654 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1545

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 236 A.D.2d 604 (Wager v. General Motors Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wager v. General Motors Corp., 236 A.D.2d 604, 654 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1545 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered January 12, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established that the location of the air conditioning unit which allegedly caused the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Augustus I. Wager was in accordance with the requirements and specifications of his employer. There was no basis for a finding of liability against the defendant (see, Leahy v Mid-West Conveyor Co., 120 AD2d 16, 18-20). In opposition to the defendant’s motion, the plaintiffs failed to raise any issue of fact. Thus, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Beisner, J.), entered January 12, 1996, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established that the location of the air conditioning unit which allegedly caused the injuries sustained by the plaintiff Augustus I. Wager was in accordance with the requirements and specifications of his employer. There was no basis for a finding of liability against the defendant (see, Leahy v Mid-West Conveyor Co., 120 AD2d 16, 18-20). In opposition to the defendant’s motion, the plaintiffs failed to raise any issue of fact. Thus, the defendant’s motion for summary judgment was properly granted. Miller, J. P., Thompson, Joy and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

236 A.D.2d 604, 654 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wager-v-general-motors-corp-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack