Wag Acquisition, LLC v. Webpower, Inc.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
WAG ACQUISITION, LLC,
Appellant
v.
WEBPOWER, INC., FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS INC., STREAMRAY INC., WMM, LLC, WMM HOLDINGS, LLC, MULTI MEDIA, LLC, DUODECAD IT SERVICES LUXEMBOURG S.A.R.L., ACCRETIVE TECHNOLOGY GROUP, INC., ICF TECHNOLOGY, INC., RISER APPS LLC,
Appellees
2018-1619
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2016- 01239.
JUDGMENT
RONALD ABRAMSON, Liston Abramson LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ARI JASON JAFFESS.
JONATHAN L. FALKLER, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellees. Appellees WebPower, Inc., FriendFinder Networks Inc., Streamray Inc., WMM, LLC, WMM Holdings, LLC, Multi Media, LLC also represented by FRANK M. GASPARO, TODD M. NOSHER, New York, NY.
KEVIN MICHAEL O'BRIEN, Baker & McKenzie LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee Duodecad IT Services Luxembourg S.A.R.L.
BRIAN G. BODINE, Lane Powell PC, Seattle, WA, for appellees Accretive Technology Group, Inc., ICF Technology, Inc., Riser Apps LLC. Also represented by ALAN D. MINSK.
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
August 26, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wag Acquisition, LLC v. Webpower, Inc. (Wag Acquisition, LLC v. Webpower, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.