Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Frias
101 A.D.3d 474, 955 N.Y.2d 337
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 11, 2012·Published
Opinion
The record shows that tenant violated two probationary stipulations in this chronic nonpayment case. Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to enforce the stipulation by its terms, which provided for no further defaults, and allow for the eviction of tenant (see Hotel Cameron, Inc. v Purcell, 35 AD3d 153, 155-156 [1st Dept 2006]; see also 565 Tenants Corp. v Adams, 54 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Frias, 101 A.D.3d 474, 955 N.Y.2d 337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).
101 A.D.3d 474 (Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Frias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hotel Cameron, Inc. v. Purcell
35 A.D.3d 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
565 Tenants Corp. v. Adams
54 A.D.3d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)