Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Frias

Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Frias

101 A.D.3d 474, 955 N.Y.2d 337
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 11, 2012
StatusPublished

This text of 101 A.D.3d 474 (Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Frias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wadsworth Ventura Associates 367 LLC v. Frias, 101 A.D.3d 474, 955 N.Y.2d 337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

The record shows that tenant violated two probationary stipulations in this chronic nonpayment case. Accordingly, it was not an abuse of discretion for the court to enforce the stipulation by its terms, which provided for no further defaults, and allow for the eviction of tenant (see Hotel Cameron, Inc. v Purcell, 35 AD3d 153, 155-156 [1st Dept 2006]; see also 565 Tenants Corp. v Adams, 54 AD3d 602 [1st Dept 2008]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Friedman, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hotel Cameron, Inc. v. Purcell
35 A.D.3d 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
565 Tenants Corp. v. Adams
54 A.D.3d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.3d 474, 955 N.Y.2d 337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wadsworth-ventura-associates-367-llc-v-frias-nyappdiv-2012.