Wadsworth v. Champion

1 Root 393
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedFebruary 15, 1792
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Root 393 (Wadsworth v. Champion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wadsworth v. Champion, 1 Root 393 (Colo. 1792).

Opinion

Dyer, J.,

dissented, upon the ground that the averments were positive, that more than lawful interest was included in said note by the corrupt agreement of the parties.

By the Court.

The facts stated and disclosed in the plea do not warrant such an inference, and unless they do, the court cannot make it.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Root 393, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wadsworth-v-champion-conn-1792.