Wadsworth v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BEDMINSTER TP.

78 A.2d 619, 11 N.J. Super. 502
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division·Decided February 5, 1951·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

11 N.J. Super. 502 (1951)
78 A.2d 619

ELIZABETH B. WADSWORTH, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BEDMINSTER, IN THE COUNTY OF SOMERSET, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND LESLIE M. APGAR, BUILDING INSPECTOR OF THE TOWNSHIP OF BEDMINSTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 29, 1951.
Decided February 5, 1951.

*506 Before Judges FREUND, PROCTOR and ROGERS.

Mr. Robert R. Daly argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Daly, Hillis, Hall & McCormick, attorneys).

Mr. Leon Gerofsky argued the cause for the respondents (Mr. William T. Stewart, Jr., of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Brennan in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wadsworth v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BEDMINSTER TP., 78 A.2d 619, 11 N.J. Super. 502 (N.J. Ct. App. 1951).

78 A.2d 619 (Wadsworth v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, BEDMINSTER TP.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mandelstam v. City Commission
26 Fla. Supp. 2d 163 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1988)
Medinets v. Hansen
106 A.2d 39 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)