Wadsworth Avenue Associates v. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP
892 N.E.2d 400, 10 N.Y.3d 931, 862 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1922
This text of 892 N.E.2d 400 (Wadsworth Avenue Associates v. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Wadsworth Avenue Associates v. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, LLP, 892 N.E.2d 400, 10 N.Y.3d 931, 862 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1922 (N.Y. 2008).
Opinion
WADSWORTH AVENUE ASSOCIATES, Appellant,
v.
PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER, LLP, et al., Respondents.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Johnson
2018 NY Slip Op 2566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
People v. Pearson
55 A.D.3d 314 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Grant
54 A.D.3d 872 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
892 N.E.2d 400, 10 N.Y.3d 931, 862 N.Y.S.2d 334, 2008 N.Y. LEXIS 1922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wadsworth-avenue-associates-v-paul-hastings-janofs-ny-2008.