Wadleigh v. Eaton

59 N.H. 574
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1880·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bingham, J.

Any person aggrieved by any probate decision, who was prevented from appealing within sixty days, through mistake, accident, or misfortune, and not from his own neglect, may be allowed an appeal. G. L., e. 207, s. 7. The law having placed the plaintiff’s property under the control of her guardian, she was unable to give a bond, with sufficient sureties, as required by Gen. Laws, c. 207, s. 3. This was a misfortune. The court may exercise its discretion as to requiring the plaintiff to furnish security for costs. G. L., c. 207, s. 10. She will not be ordered to do so at this time'. The defendant has her property in his hands, and if he is finally entitled to costs they can be adjusted in the settlement of his account.

Appeal allowed,.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wadleigh v. Eaton, 59 N.H. 574 (N.H. 1880).

59 N.H. 574 (Wadleigh v. Eaton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chesley v. Estate of Chesley
372 A.2d 281 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1977)