Wadgymar v. State

2 S.W. 768, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 459, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 173
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 5, 1886·No. Nos. 3713 and 3714·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Willson, Judge.

These appeals are from convictions had upon informations, and the records do not contain the oaths in writing required by the statute in such cases. (Code Crim. Proc., Art. 431.) The oath required by the article above cited is a necessary prerequisite to the validity of a prosecution by information,.and [460]*460the record on appeal must contain such oath, otherwise the conviction must be set aside. (Lackey v. The State, 14 Texas Ct. App., 164; Rose v. The State, 19 Texas Ct. App., 470.)

Opinion delivered June 5, 1886.

The judgments are reversed and the causes are remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wadgymar v. State, 2 S.W. 768, 21 Tex. Ct. App. 459, 1886 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 173 (Tex. Ct. App. 1886).

2 S.W. 768 (Wadgymar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Olivares v. State
76 S.W.2d 140 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1934)
Day v. State
286 S.W. 1107 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1926)