Wadford v. . Gregory Chandler Co.
This text of 197 S.E. 815 (Wadford v. . Gregory Chandler Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SEAWELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. Civil action to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the wrongful act, neglect or default of the defendant. *Page 803
It is alleged in the complaint that the plaintiff was employed by the "North Carolina Employment Relief Administration" (Vinson v. O'Berry,
It is in evidence that the "E. R. A. supervisor had full authority to direct the operation of the Gregory Chandler equipment, tell them what to do, when to start to work, how to do it, and where to go. . . . Mr. Matthews, the E. R. A. supervisor, directed the work; gave orders to the foremen. Mr. Gregory wasn't there" when plaintiff was hurt.
From the judgment of nonsuit, entered at the close of all the evidence, plaintiff appeals, assigning errors.
Affirmed on authority of Shapiro v. Winston-Salem,
Affirmed.
SEAWELL, J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
197 S.E. 815, 213 N.C. 802, 1938 N.C. LEXIS 205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wadford-v-gregory-chandler-co-nc-1938.