Wade v. Wainwright

Supreme Court of Florida

Wade v. Wainwright

273 So. 2d 377, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4828

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 28, 1973·No. No. 42812·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J, ADKINS, DE-KLE, JJ, and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur. ERVIN, J, dissents with opinion. BOYD and McCAIN, JJ, dissent and concur with ERVIN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. Upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the cited decisions present no direct conflict as required by Article V, Section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, Acting C. J, ADKINS, DE-KLE, JJ, and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur. ERVIN, J, dissents with opinion. BOYD and McCAIN, JJ, dissent and concur with ERVIN, J.

Wade v. Wainwright, 273 So. 2d 377, 1973 Fla. LEXIS 4828 (Fla. 1973).

Pincite

273 So. 2d 377 (Wade v. Wainwright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related