Wade v. Wade's Administrator

Indiana Supreme Court

Wade v. Wade's Administrator

27 Ind. 520

DecidedMay 15, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Ind. 520 (Wade v. Wade's Administrator) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wade v. Wade's Administrator, 27 Ind. 520 (Ind. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

Erazer, J.

This was an action on axx account. The complaint .is in the usual fox-m. The account sued on consists of two items, viz., “balance due on laxxd bought of deceased, $100; 14J bxxshels of , wheat, at one dollar per bushel, $14 50.” The only error assigned is, that a demurrer to the complaixxt was overx-uled. It is conceded by the appellant that the complaint showed a xight of x’ecovexy as to the wheat, and indeed there can be no doubt of it. That settles the question before us against the appellant.

The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Erazer, J.

This was an action on axx account. The complaint .is in the usual fox-m. The account sued on consists of two items, viz., “balance due on laxxd bought of deceased, $100; 14J bxxshels of , wheat, at one dollar per bushel, $14 50.” The only error assigned is, that a demurrer to the complaixxt was overx-uled. It is conceded by the appellant that the complaint showed a xight of x’ecovexy as to the wheat, and indeed there can be no doubt of it. That settles the question before us against the appellant.

The judgment is affirmed, with ten per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Ind. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-wades-administrator-ind-1867.