Wade v. Wade

173 A.D. 928, 158 N.Y.S. 555
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 173 A.D. 928 (Wade v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wade v. Wade, 173 A.D. 928, 158 N.Y.S. 555 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This action is brought for a separation. The court at Special Term denied the plaintiff’s application for alimony and counsel tees pendente lite on the ground that the court had no jurisdiction of the action. The application was decided on the pleadings and the affidavits submitted by both parties. These papers raised an issue as to the residence of the parties, upon which depended jurisdiction under section 1763, subdivision 3, of the Code of Civil Procedure. This important and vital question should not be determined upon affidavits, but rather at the trial. It has been held by this court that disputed questions of jurisdiction in cases of this kind should not be determined merely upon affidavits, but should be reserved for the trial. (Barber v. Barber, 137 App. Div. 665.) The order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs .and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs, and remitted to the Special Term to fix the amount of alimony and counsel fee. Present—Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Page and Davis, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, and remitted to the Special Term to fix the amount of alimony and counsel fee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pochna v. Pochna
18 Misc. 2d 413 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Daspin v. Daspin
282 A.D. 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
Zatarga v. Zatarga
196 Misc. 448 (New York Supreme Court, 1949)
Smart v. Smart
142 Misc. 121 (New York Supreme Court, 1931)
Goodovitch v. Reiss
129 Misc. 152 (New York Supreme Court, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.D. 928, 158 N.Y.S. 555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-wade-nyappdiv-1916.