Wade v. Wade

Supreme Court of Alabama

Wade v. Wade

419 So. 2d 1387, 1982 Ala. LEXIS 3433

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedSeptember 24, 1982

Docket81-576

StatusPublished

This text of 419 So. 2d 1387 (Wade v. Wade) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wade v. Wade, 419 So. 2d 1387, 1982 Ala. LEXIS 3433 (Ala. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

EMBRY, Justice.

James Wade appeals from a final judgment granting Freddy Wade an easement by necessity (the right of ingress and egress) over James Wade’s property.

James Wade contends the issue here is whether the trial court correctly held that an implied easement by necessity existed under the facts of this case.

Because there is no transcript of the evidence before us, although it is evident the trial court had before it evidence adduced ore tenus, we cannot review the trial court’s findings of fact. Furthermore, there is no .statement in lieu of the transcript as provided for in Rule 10(d), ARAP. See Smith v. Haynes, 364 So.2d 1168 (Ala.1978). The judgment below is due to be and is hereby affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

TORBERT, C. J., and FAULKNER, AL-MON and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI