Wade v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Wade v. State

215 S.W.3d 251, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 100, 2007 WL 148638

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 23, 2007·No. No. WD 66456·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles E. Wade appeals from the denial of his rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Charles E. Wade appeals from the denial of his rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value but a memorandum explaining our reasoning has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Wade v. State, 215 S.W.3d 251, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 100, 2007 WL 148638 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

215 S.W.3d 251 (Wade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.