Wade v. State
78 S.E. 863, 13 Ga. App. 142, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 74
Opinion
1. The admission or rejection of evidence drawn out by leading questions is generally in the sound discretion of the trial judge, and unless that discretion has been clearly abused, to the prejudice of the party complaining, this court will not interfere. 4 Enc. Dig. Ga. Rep. 45S. In the present case no abuse of this discretion appears.
2. No other error of law is complained of here, and the verdict is supported by the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wade v. State, 78 S.E. 863, 13 Ga. App. 142, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 74 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).
78 S.E. 863 (Wade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sipple v. Fowler
259 S.E.2d 142 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1979)