Wade v. State

40 So. 3d 929, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11699, 2010 WL 3120215
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 10, 2010·No. 1D09-6425·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Teddy Keith Wade, challenges his conviction for Organized Fraud, Uttering a Forged Check, and Grand Theft. Because the State did not commence prosecution for the Organized Fraud and Uttering a Forged Check offenses before their respective statutes of limitations expired; and, because the State failed to demonstrate the delay in prosecution was reasonable, we find prosecution for these two offenses was time-barred. See § 775.15(5), Fla. Stat. (2005).

We reverse Mr. Wade’s convictions for Organized Fraud and Uttering a Forged Check, affirm his conviction for Grand Theft and remand for the trial court to resentence Mr. Wade consistent with this opinion.

REVERSED.

HAWKES, C.J., KAHN and WEBSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade v. State, 40 So. 3d 929, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 11699, 2010 WL 3120215 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

40 So. 3d 929 (Wade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kontos v. American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc.
40 So. 3d 929 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)