Wade v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Wade v. State

141 So. 916, 25 Ala. App. 138, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 127

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 17, 1932

Docket6 Div. 167.

StatusPublished

This text of 141 So. 916 (Wade v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wade v. State, 141 So. 916, 25 Ala. App. 138, 1932 Ala. App. LEXIS 127 (Ala. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

RICE, J.

• This is the second appeal in this case. See. Wade w. State, 24 Ala. App. 176, 132 So. 71.

'The testimony on the two trials was substantially the same. Upon the instant trial, the rulings held for error on the former appeal were not again present.

There is really nothing worthy of mention apparent. What was said in the opinion by Judge Samford upon the former appeal suffices to demonstrate the lack of prejudicial error in any ruling made upon the trial resulting in the judgment from which this appeal is taken.’

The motion for a new trial and the ruling of the court thereon are not made a part of the bill.of exceptions, or we believe more accurately it should be stated no exception to the ruling upon the motion for a new trial is shown by said bill of exceptions, and therefore same cannot be considered. Law et al. v. Ogle, 224 Ala. 344, 140 So. 393.

No prejudicial error anywhere appearing, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI