Wade v. Ringo

Supreme Court of Missouri

Wade v. Ringo

25 S.W. 901, 122 Mo. 322, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 67

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedMay 28, 1894

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 25 S.W. 901 (Wade v. Ringo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wade v. Ringo, 25 S.W. 901, 122 Mo. 322, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 67 (Mo. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

(Black, C. J., Brace and Barclay, JJ.)

Having heard arguments of counsel and duly considered the points submitted on plaintiffs appeal, we conclude that the judgment delivered by Judge Hughes is in all respects a correct treatment of the facts of this case and of the law applicable thereto. We therefore deem it unnecessary to repeat what was then said; but, approving his judgment, direct that it be affirmed.

Macearlane, J., did not sit in this cause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

(Black, C. J., Brace and Barclay, JJ.)

Having heard arguments of counsel and duly considered the points submitted on plaintiffs appeal, we conclude that the judgment delivered by Judge Hughes is in all respects a correct treatment of the facts of this case and of the law applicable thereto. We therefore deem it unnecessary to repeat what was then said; but, approving his judgment, direct that it be affirmed.

Macearlane, J., did not sit in this cause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 S.W. 901, 122 Mo. 322, 1894 Mo. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-ringo-mo-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack