Wade v. Peterson

24 So. 3d 1204, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19034, 2009 WL 4604528
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 8, 2009
Docket1D09-5414
StatusPublished

This text of 24 So. 3d 1204 (Wade v. Peterson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wade v. Peterson, 24 So. 3d 1204, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19034, 2009 WL 4604528 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner fails to demonstrate that he first sought disqualification of the trial judge by filing a proper motion in the circuit court. Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.330; Campbell v. Lungstrum, 732 So.2d 437 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). The petition for writ of prohibition is therefore denied.

KAHN, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. LUNGSTRUM USAA
732 So. 2d 437 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 So. 3d 1204, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 19034, 2009 WL 4604528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-peterson-fladistctapp-2009.