Wade v. N.G. Wade Investment Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wade v. N.G. Wade Investment Co.

802 So. 2d 1200, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 2002 WL 15565

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 8, 2002

DocketNo. 1D00-4827

StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 1200 (Wade v. N.G. Wade Investment Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wade v. N.G. Wade Investment Co., 802 So. 2d 1200, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 2002 WL 15565 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to determine from the face of the May 12, 1999, letter whether it is an integrated contract incorporating the entire agreement between the parties without indulging in at least one inference in favor of appellee. Accordingly, we conclude that there are disputed issues of fact which preclude summary judgment, see Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc., 732 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Young v. Morris Realty Co., 569 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Pinnacle Holding, Inc. v. Biologies, Inc., 643 So.2d 642 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1994); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts: Evidence of Prior or Contemporaneous Agreements and Negotiations § 214 (1981), and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ. concur. WOLF, J., dissents with written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We are unable to determine from the face of the May 12, 1999, letter whether it is an integrated contract incorporating the entire agreement between the parties without indulging in at least one inference in favor of appellee. Accordingly, we conclude that there are disputed issues of fact which preclude summary judgment, see Cox v. CSX Intermodal, Inc., 732 So.2d 1092 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999); Young v. Morris Realty Co., 569 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Pinnacle Holding, Inc. v. Biologies, Inc., 643 So.2d 642 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1994); see also Restatement (Second) of Contracts: Evidence of Prior or Contemporaneous Agreements and Negotiations § 214 (1981), and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ. concur. WOLF, J., dissents with written opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 So. 2d 1200, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 77, 2002 WL 15565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-ng-wade-investment-co-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack