Wade v. Mussleman

14 Ind. 362

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 1860·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Suit upon a note. Answer, without oath, denying the execution of the note. Demurrer to the answer sustained, and final judgment for the plaintiff.

The answer made a good issue, but did not put the plaintiff upon proof of the execution of the note. The demurrer to it was erroneously sustained.

D. D. Dykeman, for the appellant. E. Walker, for the appellee.

The- judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Suit upon a note. Answer, without oath, denying the execution of the note. Demurrer to the answer sustained, and final judgment for the plaintiff.

The answer made a good issue, but did not put the plaintiff upon proof of the execution of the note. The demurrer to it was erroneously sustained.

D. D. Dykeman, for the appellant. E. Walker, for the appellee.

The- judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Wade v. Mussleman, 14 Ind. 362 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

14 Ind. 362 (Wade v. Mussleman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.