Wade v. Montgomery County
Opinion
□ Southern District of Texas ENTERED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT October 31. 2019 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS David J. Bra dley Clerk HOUSTON DIVISION ALYSSA WADE, § § Plaintiff, § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 4:17-CV-1040 § MONTGOMERY COUNTY, § § Defendant. § ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation (Instrument No. 67) signed by Magistrate Judge Christina Bryan on September 30, 2019, regarding the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, Instruments 50 and 54, Plaintiff timely filed objections. The Court has reviewed the Memorandum and Recommendation and objection and made a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's recommended dispositions to which objections were raised, Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P.; 28 US.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McLeod, Alexander, Powel & Apffel P.C. v. Quarles, 925 F.2d 853, 855 (Sth Cir. 1991), and after consideration of the applicable law, is of the opinion that said Memorandum and Recommendation should be adopted by this Court. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that United States Magistrate Judge Bryan's Memorandum and see lot is hereby adopted by this Court. SIGNED on this ma day of OD ican. , 2019, at Houston, Texas.
-VANESSAD.GILMORE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Wade v. Montgomery County (Wade v. Montgomery County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.