Wade v. Miami Dade Board of County Commissioners

922 So. 2d 402, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3246, 2006 WL 547969
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 2006
DocketNo. 3D05-1192
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 922 So. 2d 402 (Wade v. Miami Dade Board of County Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wade v. Miami Dade Board of County Commissioners, 922 So. 2d 402, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3246, 2006 WL 547969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Pino v. District Ct. of App., Third Dist., 604 So.2d 1232, 1233 (Fla.1992)(mandamus is not appropriate where the petitioner has other legal methods for obtaining relief); Williams v. Schulman, 721 So.2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(petitioner not entitled to mandamus where an adequate remedy at law was available); Miami-Dade County v. Palmetto Bay, 744 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(whether to “move forward towards authorizing incorporation” is a “discretionary political decision”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henley v. State
201 So. 3d 648 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
922 So. 2d 402, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3246, 2006 WL 547969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-miami-dade-board-of-county-commissioners-fladistctapp-2006.