Wade v. Miami Dade Board of County Commissioners

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wade v. Miami Dade Board of County Commissioners

922 So. 2d 402, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3246, 2006 WL 547969

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 2006·No. No. 3D05-1192·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Pino v. District Ct. of App., Third Dist., 604 So.2d 1232, 1233 (Fla.1992)(mandamus is not appropriate where the petitioner has other legal methods for obtaining relief); Williams v. Schulman, 721 So.2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(petitioner not entitled to mandamus where an adequate remedy at law was available); Miami-Dade County v. Palmetto Bay, 744 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(whether to “move forward towards authorizing incorporation” is a “discretionary political decision”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Pino v. District Ct. of App., Third Dist., 604 So.2d 1232, 1233 (Fla.1992)(mandamus is not appropriate where the petitioner has other legal methods for obtaining relief); Williams v. Schulman, 721 So.2d 1244, 1245 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998)(petitioner not entitled to mandamus where an adequate remedy at law was available); Miami-Dade County v. Palmetto Bay, 744 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)(whether to “move forward towards authorizing incorporation” is a “discretionary political decision”).

Wade v. Miami Dade Board of County Commissioners, 922 So. 2d 402, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 3246, 2006 WL 547969 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

922 So. 2d 402 (Wade v. Miami Dade Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related