Wade v. Kay

97 So. 129, 210 Ala. 122, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 146
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 30, 1923
Docket6 Div. 905.
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 97 So. 129 (Wade v. Kay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Wade v. Kay, 97 So. 129, 210 Ala. 122, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 146 (Ala. 1923).

Opinion

SOMERVILLE, J.

Section 3011 of the Code gives a lien to attorneys on “suits, judgments, and decrees for money,” for services rendered in reference thereto. Though the- lien is given on suits as well as judgments and decrees it is clear that there can be no enforcement of such a lien until the suit has been prosecuted to judgment.

The petition here exhibited is but an appéndage to the main proceeding — the administration of an estate; and though it does not allege that a decree had been rendered in that proceeding allotting to petitioner’s client what she was due to receive from the estate, *123 the trial court had before it the entire record in the case, and was bound to know that such a decree had, in fact, been rendered, and was bound to decree upon the demurrer to this petition in the light of that knowledge.

This court knows of the existence and the terms of that decree by the inspection of its own records in the case of Blount County Bk., as Adm’r of the Estate of Wade v. Kay (Ala. Sup.) 95 South. 297, 1 involving this same administration wherein the final decree of the administering court is pertinently set forth. Ala. City, etc., Co. v. Bates, 155 Ala. 347, 46 South. 776.

The decree directs the administrator to pay:

“A. All costs and expenses of the administration of said estate, together with all legal liabilities, * * * together with $2,000, to be paid to Mrs. C. E. Wade [the respondent herein] in lieu of the homestead, and to Mrs. C. E. Wade $100, balance due her on her personal property exemptions, and together with $250, * * * to refund her for monies paid by her on debts of the decedent.”

The decree also gives to Mrs. Wade a distributive share in the balance of the estate.

Courts of equity have a general jurisdiction for the enforcement of common-law liens, and also of statutory liens when the statute does not otherwise expressly provide for their enforcement. Evans v. Silvey & Co., 144 Ala. 398, 42 South. 63; Wynn v. Tallapoosa County Bk., 168 Ala. 469, 53 South. 228. Moreover, section 4829 of the Code provides that any lien may be enforced in equity.

The petition exhibited a valid lien enforceable in equity, and was not subject to any of the grounds of demurrer assigned. It results that the decree overruling the demurrer is free from error, and must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and MeCLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.
1

209 Ala. 74.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carnes v. Shores
318 So. 2d 305 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1975)
Locke v. Barranco
102 So. 2d 2 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
State v. Brooks
53 So. 2d 329 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Peach v. Drennen
44 So. 2d 257 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1950)
Ex Parte Blackmon
191 So. 356 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
State ex rel. Carmichael v. Bibb
191 So. 356 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1939)
City of Carbon Hill v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.
185 So. 387 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile
178 So. 441 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1938)
Lamar v. Rivers
178 So. 16 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
McGowin v. McGowin
169 So. 232 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1936)
Cartwright v. Hughes
147 So. 399 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1933)
Johnson v. Gerald
113 So. 447 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 So. 129, 210 Ala. 122, 1923 Ala. LEXIS 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-kay-ala-1923.