Wade v. Department of Children and Families

79 So. 3d 946, 2012 WL 580527, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2774
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 23, 2012·No. 1D11-6034·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to presenting the argument set forth therein in the pending appeal of the agency’s final order. See Noack v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 872 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (where an adequate remedy can be afforded on plenary appeal, mandamus relief is unwarranted).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade v. Department of Children and Families, 79 So. 3d 946, 2012 WL 580527, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2774 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

79 So. 3d 946 (Wade v. Department of Children and Families) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DEPENA v. Molina
79 So. 3d 946 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)