Wade v. Department of Children and Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Wade v. Department of Children and Families

79 So. 3d 946, 2012 WL 580527, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2774

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 23, 2012

Docket1D11-6034

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 So. 3d 946 (Wade v. Department of Children and Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Wade v. Department of Children and Families, 79 So. 3d 946, 2012 WL 580527, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2774 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to presenting the argument set forth therein in the pending appeal of the agency’s final order. See Noack v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 872 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (where an adequate remedy can be afforded on plenary appeal, mandamus relief is unwarranted).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied without prejudice to presenting the argument set forth therein in the pending appeal of the agency’s final order. See Noack v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 872 So.2d 370 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (where an adequate remedy can be afforded on plenary appeal, mandamus relief is unwarranted).

VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 So. 3d 946, 2012 WL 580527, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 2774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-department-of-children-and-families-fladistctapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack