Wade v. Angelone
This text of 39 F. App'x 929 (Wade v. Angelone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Terrell C. Wade appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the rec *930 ord and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Wade’s motion for a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wade v. Angelone, No. CA-01-471-2 (E.D.Va. Jan. 7, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 F. App'x 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-v-angelone-ca4-2002.