Wade Holman, Jr. v. Robert L. Eklund

354 F.2d 1006

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 11, 1966·No. 20181_1·Published

Opinion

354 F.2d 1006

Wade HOLMAN, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Robert L. EKLUND, Appellee.

No. 20181.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1966, Rehearing Denied March 11, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

Wade Holman, Jr., in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., of Cal., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anthony M. Summers, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, JERTBERG and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

354 F.2d 1006

Wade HOLMAN, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Robert L. EKLUND, Appellee.

No. 20181.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 31, 1966, Rehearing Denied March 11, 1966.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.

Wade Holman, Jr., in pro. per.

Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., of Cal., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anthony M. Summers, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before BARNES, JERTBERG and ELY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The order appealed from is affirmed.

Wade Holman, Jr. v. Robert L. Eklund, 354 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1966).

Pincite

354 F.2d 1006 (Wade Holman, Jr. v. Robert L. Eklund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.