Wade Holman, Jr. v. Robert L. Eklund
This text of 354 F.2d 1006 (Wade Holman, Jr. v. Robert L. Eklund) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
354 F.2d 1006
Wade HOLMAN, Jr., Appellant,
v.
Robert L. EKLUND, Appellee.
No. 20181.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 31, 1966, Rehearing Denied March 11, 1966.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Central Division; Leon R. Yankwich, Judge.
Wade Holman, Jr., in pro. per.
Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., of Cal., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., Anthony M. Summers, Deputy Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before BARNES, JERTBERG and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The order appealed from is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
354 F.2d 1006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-holman-jr-v-robert-l-eklund-ca9-1966.