Wade Byron Morgan v. State
This text of Wade Byron Morgan v. State (Wade Byron Morgan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-19-00077-CR __________________
WADE BYRON MORGAN, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 75th District Court Liberty County, Texas Trial Cause No. CR22130 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Wade Byron Morgan filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s order of
February 27, 2019, which denied Morgan’s motion for entry of a judgment nunc pro
tunc. We questioned our jurisdiction over this appeal. Morgan filed a response but
did not establish our jurisdiction over this appeal. The State filed a response alleging
that this Court lacks jurisdiction. We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because an
order denying a motion for judgment nunc pro tunc is not appealable. See Everett v. 1 State, 82 S.W.3d 735, 735 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, pet. dism’d); Allen v. State, 20
S.W.3d 164, 165 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2000, no pet. [mand. denied]).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
_________________________ LEANNE JOHNSON Justice
Submitted on April 9, 2019 Opinion Delivered April 10, 2019 Do Not Publish
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Wade Byron Morgan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/wade-byron-morgan-v-state-texapp-2019.