Waddle v. State

167 S.W.3d 664, 357 Ark. 381, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 306
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided May 13, 2004·No. CR 04-179·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant Irene Waddle, through her attorney, John m. Irwin, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. Mr. Irwin admits responsibility for failing to timely file the record due to a- mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by an attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waddle v. State, 167 S.W.3d 664, 357 Ark. 381, 2004 Ark. LEXIS 306 (Ark. 2004).

167 S.W.3d 664 (Waddle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related