Waddle v. Ishe
12 Ala. 308
Opinion
The utmost effect which can be claimed for the proceedings before the justice is, that prima facie the judgment pronounced by him would be considered as upon the merits. But its effect was entirely destroyed as soon as the further fact was disclosed that he dismissed the cause for the reason that his court was without jurisdiction. [Estell v. Tant, 2 Yerg. 467; N. E. Bank v. Lewis, 8 Pick. 113; Hughes v. Blake, 1 Mason, 519.]
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Waddle v. Ishe, 12 Ala. 308 (Ala. 1847).
12 Ala. 308 (Waddle v. Ishe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brock v. Harris
42 So. 2d 39 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1949)
City of Birmingham v. Brown
69 So. 263 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1915)
Herpolsheimer v. Acme Harvester Co.
119 N.W. 30 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1908)