Waddington v. Chamberlin
2 Cai. Cas. 251
This text of 2 Cai. Cas. 251 (Waddington v. Chamberlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Waddington v. Chamberlin, 2 Cai. Cas. 251 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1804).
Opinion
LAST term the court had, in this fuit, granted a fule to íhew caufe why an attachment ihould not iifue againft A. B. but from fome accident in the clerk’s office, in Albany, the rule had not been forwarded, fo as to admit of ferving a copy twenty days before the term.
Riggs, on thefe fafts, moved to renew the rule for the attachment, which was
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Cai. Cas. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waddington-v-chamberlin-nysupct-1804.