Waddington Bank v. Burns

250 A.D. 809, 296 N.Y.S. 445, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9076

Opinion

Plaintiff in each of these actions has appealed from an order of the Special Term of the Supreme Court denying its application for an order vacating a notice for the examination of its cashier before trial. The actions are to recover on promissory notes. The answers plead affirmative defenses raising issues as to the validity of the notes, their transfers, and present ownership. Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements as of one motion. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Heffeman, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Waddington Bank v. Burns, 250 A.D. 809, 296 N.Y.S. 445, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9076 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

250 A.D. 809 (Waddington Bank v. Burns) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.