Waddill v. State

33 Tex. 343
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1870
StatusPublished

This text of 33 Tex. 343 (Waddill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Waddill v. State, 33 Tex. 343 (Tex. 1870).

Opinion

Walker, J.

In Slaughter v. The State, 24 Texas R., 410, the verdict, upon an indictment for murder, was “guilty,” and the punishment assessed was adequate only for an offense of a minor degree.

. The court say: “On an indictment for an offense divided into different degrees, a general verdict ©f guilty, assessing a penalty applicable only to one of the inferior degrees, and which does not find the defendant not guilty of the higher degrees, is insufficient to support a judgment of conviction; and is ground to .arrest the . judgment.”

In the present case the verdict was not general but special, and the punishment determined by the jury was the proper punishment for the guilt of the defendant, as found by them. It cannot, therefore, afford ground for arresting the judgment. The judgment is affirmed and cause remanded.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Tex. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/waddill-v-state-tex-1870.